home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Internet Tools (InfoMagic)
/
Internet Tools.iso
/
dos_win
/
winsock
/
maillist
/
94-05.Z
/
94-05
/
000178_backman@mailserv-B.ftp.com_Fri May 13 02:00:50 1994.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
1994-05-31
|
2KB
Received: from ftp.com (wd40.ftp.com) by SunSITE.Unc.EDU (5.65c+IDA/FvK-1.07) with SMTP
id AA25788; Fri, 13 May 1994 05:58:12 -0400
Received: from ftp.com by ftp.com ; Fri, 13 May 1994 05:58:11 -0400
Received: from mailserv-B.ftp.com by ftp.com ; Fri, 13 May 1994 05:58:11 -0400
Received: from backman.homerun by mailserv-B.ftp.com (5.0/SMI-SVR4)
id AA08214; Fri, 13 May 94 06:00:50 EDT
Date: Fri, 13 May 94 06:00:50 EDT
Message-Id: <9405131000.AA08214@mailserv-B.ftp.com>
To: CJS@psuvm.psu.edu
Subject: Re: Netmanage's Socket Wrencher
From: backman@ftp.com (Larry Backman)
Cc: Multiple recipients of list <winsock@sunsite.unc.edu>
Sender: backman@mailserv-B.ftp.com
Repository: mailserv-B.ftp.com, [message accepted at Fri May 13 06:00:39 1994]
Originating-Client: homerun
Content-Length: 768
>> I'd be interested in what other (more knowledgeable) people think of
>> these tests and what results you get with different stacks.
>>
I'm a knowledgable people and I can assure you that using this tool
or any of our or other companies performance tools I can show
you any numbers you want :-).
I can show you Vxd's faster than TSR's; TSR's faster than Vxd';s; DLL's
faster than VXD's; etc.
Any one stack can be tuned optimally to perform better than another.
Any one stack can scream over Card A, and crawl over Card B.
Any one stack can scream ove NDIS and crawl over ODI or PD.
Don't believe any performance analysis you see or produce unless
its extensive w/ multiple runs for stack tuning, differnet cards,
different drivers, difference CPU's.
Larry